Time and spirited discussions occur on internet fora regarding an study of the status of a variety of jyotish parameters( such as chara dasha (a sign based planetary period astrofactor) and also karakamsha (the navamsha where the atmakaraka (most complex planet in longitude) is placed. As happens, a few of the discussants began to branch into other side discussions which had nothing related to all the first questions or topics along with some became a bit exercised and emotional, as also usually happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks are demanded to be able to get to the underside of matters and where some times an interest has been discussed on several distinct boards and lots of issues simultaneously on a given board! As too is average, nothing has been really resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about those issues coming again and again and directing visitors to archives etc.. Alas, the yahoo forums/fora are such that merely limited hunting of previous messages is possible without losing all of one's hair, and also the writings sometimes are maintained onto another yahoo site so that this does not help things when everybody wants is to have a quick overview of what others are using and if possible their reasons for embracing a certain position! This latter usually brings forth more gall than good information though the aim of the individual posing the question might have been very commendable and perhaps not at all confrontational. Knowing Jyotish does not protect one from harbouring Neurotic characteristics!
Somewhere, along the path of the former pursuit, yet another topic got endured and began questioning the usage of varga kundalis or varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the center of jyotish and have been used by tropical astrologers at the form of harmonic charts. Now this really is some thing which is utilized in Jyotish going back to almost the first memories of the earliest members at the discussion that finally admitted to this type of case. I myself, though myself not that mature, have experienced horoscopes which were drawn in the century before last where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha along with dashamsha and so forth and more importantly had commented on these graphs in his reading. kalyan chart So, at the least many people were utilizing varga-charts a couple of hundred years ago and possibly maybe even prior to those times.
Somewhere through the conversation, in another of the lists, one of the associates left available an article in that the author had voiced notions to the contrary, i.e., vargas must not be utilised at a chart format. A discussion ensued which side stepped the important and relevant matter of the practical merits of using of navamsha varga being an secondary chart. A few individuals asked for proofs in classics which indicates that ancient jyotishis advocated of varga chakras. The discussants highlighted that ONLY rashi chakra has to be used along with varga placements should only be useful for determining the advantages of planets etc..
Nowadays, those who have studied BPHS will understand that 16 vargas had been defined by the Sage starting with rashi ehich is known as'kshetra' (field or area) and so on. One of the associates attracted on each of astrologers' attention that Parashara had described very plainly how to find out bhavas from the rashi graph (ascendant, 10th house and trisection of those arcs, etc. . V of BPHS). This was really true and also a positive step ahead of the conversation. There were parallel discussions going on which were rehashing that BPHS wasn't original and was perhaps not even a timeless and published by one or even a group of'latter day saints' [my word, not the first poster's!] In Jyotish and therefore cannot be treated as being a classic. Obviously, there is some support to this as could be similarly expected if some one were to make a comment that Jyotish was only a derivative of astrology that the army that came with Alexander brought to India. An issue that has been understood to bring even untoward jyotishis on the"warpath!"
To individuals who were interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there seemed to be two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Just Rashi horoscopes should be properly used. Other varga kundalis were the product of corrupt comprehension of the classics which themselves many concur may not have lived in pure shape [though a number of them have mercifully survived in reasonably good shape1]. Underlying this is the belief some can harbor this, alike the iceberg, available Jyotish is only 1/10th of the total body while the underwater 9/10th is largely lost and partly hidden in the secret chambers of paramparas plus a number of the secret documents that you can get but jealously guarded by the custodian families. I don't know just how a lot with the iceberg postulate is established data and how much is wishful fiction. According to the purists with the particular stream of thought, vargas MUST simply be applied as measures of quantitative and qualitative strength of planets and for that consideration of this deities and primal forces those represent although perhaps not at the form of a horoscope and clearly no serious consideration must be directed at aspects and bhava considerations. Just for clarity, they would assert, for example, that as the next dwelling lord in navamsha is a significant index, the fact it is set in the 2nd navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in second house in navamsha chart) isn't significant.
(b) Irrespective of whether explicitly described or perhaps not, one other flow of believing asserts that varga kundalis have a significant part to play at Jyotish and potentially are of significant usefulness in identifying chief mandates matters pertaining to the prescription given by sages. To put it differently, navamsha graph, as an instance, would hold significant sway on matters of spouse and marriage, whilst saptamsha chart would be of import at the study of children in a specific nativity's reading. These Vargas should be analyzed in a chart format.
In reality, the majority of these utilized concepts from (a) and (b) streams. There seemed to be some other individuals who totally denied the veracity of thought stream (b) and a few were a bit taciturn about any of this, perhaps to avoid acrimony and becoming ensnared from the controversy. Or there were some other factors, known only to them.