Time and again spirited negotiations take place on internet fora pertaining to an examination of the status of a number of jyotish parameters( such as chara dasha (a signal based cortical period astrofactor) and also karakamsha (the navamsha where the atmakaraka (most advanced planet in longitude) is set. As happens, a number of the discussants began to branch to other side discussions which had nothing to do with all the initial questions or topics along with some became a little resolved and emotional, as also often happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks have been demanded so as to get into the bottom of things and where sometimes an interest is being discussed on a lot of unique boards and lots of issues simultaneously on a particular board! As too is typical, nothing has been resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their insecurities concerning such topics coming up again and again again and directing people to writings etc.. Alas, the ya-hoo forums/fora are such that merely limited searching of past messages is possible without losing most one's hair, and the archives are often kept on yet another yahoo site and that this does not help things when all one wants is to receive a quick overview of what others are already using and if possible their reasons for adopting a certain position! This latter usually brings out more gall than good advice though the intention of the person posing the question might have been quite noble and maybe not in any respect confrontational.
Somewhere, across the path of this former quest, yet another issue got born and began questioning the usage of varga kundalis or varga chakras, divisional horoscopes which are the heart of jyotish and have been used by tropical astrologers in the kind of harmonic graphs. Now this is something that is employed in Jyotish going straight back to almost the very first memories of even the oldest members at the discussion that eventually confessed to such being the situation. I myself, though myself maybe not that senior, have seen horoscopes which were attracted in the century before last where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and so on and much more to the point had commented on these charts in his own reading. kalyan chart Therefore, at the very least some individuals were utilizing varga-charts a handful of hundred decades ago and conceivably perhaps even prior to those times.
Somewhere throughout the discussion, in one of those lists, one of the members left available a post in which the author had voiced notions to the contrary, i.e., vargas should not be used in a graph format. A conversation ensued which side stepped the more important and applicable matter of these practical merits of using of navamsha varga like an secondary graph. A couple of individuals asked for proofs in classics which indicates that ancient jyotishis urged of varga chakras. The discussants emphasized that ONLY rashi chakra has to be properly used along with varga placements should just be useful for ascertaining the advantages of planets etc..
One of those associates brought on each of astrologers' attention that Parashara had described very clearly how exactly to determine bhavas in the rashi chart (ascendant, 10th dwelling and then trisection of the arcs, etc. . V of BPHS). This was really true and a positive step forward in the discussion. There were also parallel discussions going which were rehashing that BPHS wasn't original and was not even a timeless and published by one or a group of'latter day saints' [my word, not the original poster!] In Jyotish and so can't be treated as being a classic. Obviously, there is some support to this as could be similarly expected if someone were to make a comment that Jyotish was just a derivative of Babylonian astrology that the army that was included with Alexander brought to India. An issue that has been recognized to bring even untoward jyotishis out on the"war-path!"
To individuals who have been interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there appeared to be just two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Just Rashi horoscopes should be used. Other varga kundalis were the merchandise of corrupt comprehension of the classics which themselves many concur may not have endured in pristine form [although a number of these have mercifully survived in pretty great shape1]. Underlying this is the view some could harbor that, alike the iceberg, available Jyotish is just 1/10th of their entire body as the submerged 9/10th is mostly lost and partially hidden in the secret chambers of paramparas plus a number of the secret records which exist but jealously guarded by the custodian families. I don't know how a lot with this iceberg postulate is based facts and how much is wishful fiction. As stated by the purists of the stream of thought, vargas MUST only be utilized as measures of quantitative and qualitative strength of planets and also because of the consideration of the deities and primal forces people represent however, not in the kind of a horoscope and certainly no serious consideration has to be directed at aspects along with bhava considerations. Only for clarity, they would assert, for example, that while the next house lord in navamsha is an important index, the fact that it is placed in the next navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in 2 nd house in navamsha chart) is not important. Or, for instance, when Mars is in Aries sign and Libra navamsha, and Saturn is in Gemini sign and Libra navamsha, both planets are not related (though they would be depicted to be conjoined in precisely the exact same navamsha varga in a navamsha chart).
(b) Regardless of whether specifically clarified or maybe not, the other stream of thinking maintains that varga kundalis have an important function to play at Jyotish and possibly are of significant usefulness in differentiating chief mandates matters regarding the prescription written by sages. To put it differently, navamsha chart, by way of instance, would hold significant influence on matters of marriage and spouse, whilst saptamsha chart would be of similar import from the examination of children in a specific nativity's reading. These Vargas ought to be examined in a graph format.
There seemed to be some other individuals who totally denied that the veracity of idea stream (b) and a few were a little taciturn about it, perhaps in order to avoid acrimony and becoming ensnared in the controversy. Or there were several other good reasons, known only to them.